[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
structure type specifier
- To: Common-Lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: structure type specifier
- From: Christopher Fry <cfry@OZ.AI.MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 87 22:23 EST
STRUCTURE is not a legal type specifier according to
CLtL p 43 table of type specifier symbols.
Seems awfully useful & natural to me.
Has CLtL been superceded? Did I miss some reference somewhere?
Similarly STRUCTUREP isn't a CL function.
Does anyone have a CL implementation without structurep or equivalent?