[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
:allow-other-keys
- To: cl@kim.berkeley.edu
- Subject: :allow-other-keys
- From: franz!fimass!franz!rfr@kim.berkeley.edu (Robert Rorschach)
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 86 13:07:03 PST
- Resent-date: Fri, 25 Apr 86 13:07:03 PST
- Resent-from: franz!fimass!jkf@kim.berkeley.edu
- Resent-message-id: <8604260548.AA03204@kim.berkeley.edu>
- Resent-to: common-lisp@su-ai.arpa
- Sender: franz!fimass!jkf@kim.berkeley.edu
The way CLtL is written, this keyword's behaviour is nonstandard.
(foo :allow-other-keys nil :allow-other-keys t),
according to the letter, allows other keys. With all other keyword
arguments, only the first occurrence of the keyword counts.
Does anyone know whether this anomaly is intentional?
It seems like it could be an accident of phrasing.