[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Environment Committee
- To: Jeff Dalton <jeff%aiva.edinburgh.ac.uk@CS.UCL.AC.UK>
- Subject: Environment Committee
- From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1986 02:22:00 -0000
- Cc: aarons%svga.susx.ac.uk@CS.UCL.AC.UK, common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA, johnw%svga.susx.ac.uk@CS.UCL.AC.UK, rhr%aiva.edinburgh.ac.uk@CS.UCL.AC.UK
- In-reply-to: Msg of 1 Mar 1986 14:28-EST from Jeff Dalton <jeff%aiva.edinburgh.ac.uk at cs.ucl.ac.uk>
- Sender: FAHLMAN@C.CS.CMU.EDU
Is it safe to assume that when Common Lisp is being compiled by Pop11,
the system is operating as a Common Lisp superset? If not, how do you
do macros? If so, one might still argue that nobody has implemented a
Common Lisp compiler that is not in Common Lisp. The point of this is
that we might want to specify more clearly what effect various
compilation operations ahve on "the surrounding Lisp system".
-- Scott