[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
A package to contain Common LISP extensions.
- To: "BACH::GREEK" <email@example.com>, common-lisp <common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA>
- Subject: A package to contain Common LISP extensions.
- From: David C. Plummer <DCP@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 86 12:54 EST
- In-reply-to: The message from "BACH::GREEK" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: "BACH::GREEK" <email@example.com>
Of course DEC's EXTENDED-LISP package would contain different things
than Symbolic's. That's the purpose of the EXTENDED-LISP package.
Perhaps LISP-EXTENSIONS would be a better name. I just think that
everyone should agree on the name of the package to contain their
extensions. Then a user would at least have a place to start.
To start what? I don't think there is such a thing as common
extensions, so it doesn't make much sense to me to agree to put our
uncommon extensions in a common package.