[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Guy.Steele at CMU-10A, common-lisp at SU-AI
- Subject: Named lambdas
- From: Daniel L. Weinreb <dlw at SCRC-TENEX at MIT-MC>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1982 14:46:00 -0000
- In-reply-to: The message of 9 Nov 82 22:33-EST from Guy.Steele at CMU-10A
Yes, we should have NAMED-LAMBDA. It is invaluable for debugging if you
ever use interpreted code.
CONSTANTP is OK with me; I have no strong feelings about it.