[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: commonlisp types
- To: quiroz%cs.rochester.edu@RIVERSIDE.SCRC.SYMBOLICS.COM, common-lisp%sail.stanford.edu@RIVERSIDE.SCRC.SYMBOLICS.COM
- Subject: Re: commonlisp types
- From: Robert W. Kerns <RWK@F.ILA.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 89 21:42 EST
- In-reply-to: <8901070112.AA09737@lesath.cs.rochester.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 89 20:12:09 -0500
: So I'm curious. Does any compiler actually get this right?
KCL. See script at the end of this message.
OK, next question: Does it open-code or otherwise optimize TYPEP, or
just call TYPEP on the list?
If you don't know, I'll check it next time I use KCL (which will be
BTW, our mailer didn't like the address
Robert W. Kerns <RWK@FUJI.ILA.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM>
on the excuse that FUJI.ILA.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM is an unknown host.
"It's not my PLANET, Monkey Boy!"
-- John Wharten (villan from Buckaroo Bonzai)
As a workaround, you can use
which is essentially what I have to do to send to you.
Or you can use RWK@AI.AI.MIT.Edu, which forwards to the same place.