[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constant folding/smashing
- To: David L. Andre <DLA@JASPER.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: Re: constant folding/smashing
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 88 15:24 EDT
- Cc: Cyphers@JASPER.SCRC.Symbolics.COM, NGALL@g.bbn.com, common-lisp@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: <19880610191103.0.DLA@KOYAANISQATSI.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 88 15:11 EDT
From: David L. Andre <DLA@JASPER.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 88 14:28 EDT
From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: 10 Jun 1988 11:03-EDT
I don't of
anything that says that Common Lisp must treat quoted general vectors
differently from quoted strings.
Actually, CLtL (p. 78) is specific that an implementation only collapse
objects which are EQUAL. I personally think this is inconsistent and a
bug in CLtL.
Thanks, I somehow missed seeing that in CLtL. I agree with you that this
is inconsistent. Actually, just about anything in Common Lisp that has
anything at all to do with equality seems to be out of whack.