[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
All arrays can be adjustable?
- To: Scott E. Fahlman <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>, David C. Plummer <DCP@QUABBIN.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Subject: All arrays can be adjustable?
- From: David C. Plummer <DCP@QUABBIN.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 87 15:53 EDT
- Cc: common-lisp@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: <FAHLMAN.12303901889.BABYL@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
Well, I guess I blew it. (I had it right when I first wrote it and then
made the mistake of thinking too much and conversed everything.) The
idea still stands: figure out formal relationships and draw conclusions
from them. What I meant, in IF-THEN language, was
IF not adjustable, and
no fill-pointer, and
Contrapositive (for those that believe in it):
IF not simple
I agree with whoever (Moon?) said that simple is largely a semantic
concept that allows implementations to get leverage if they can.