[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Don Morrison <DFM%JASPER@live-oak.lcs.mit.edu>
- Subject: Compiling CASE
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@Think.COM>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 87 12:58 EDT
- Cc: Hvatum@mit-multics.arpa, email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <870408103703.5.DFM@WHITBY.PALLADIAN.COM>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 87 10:37 EDT
From: Don Morrison <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I wonder, however, if all implementations do the right thing if you declare a macro
which is treated specially as notinline?
I don't think it should be necessary to declare/proclaim a macro
notinline. For the macro to work at all, the defmacro must be seen by
the compiler before it tries to compile the use of the macro. I would
hope that the macro would be smart enough to notice that the user has
overridden the default definition.