[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Renaming SETF to SET would be a bad idea, because there is a whole
family of xxxF functions.  Some of them are modified versions of
functions without the F, so you can't just take the F off of all
of them.

Back in about 1973 when SETF was part of DEFSTRUCT, its name meant
"set field".  It doesn't exactly mean that any more, of course.