[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Macros -> declarations
- To: Kent M Pitman <KMP@SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA>
- Subject: Macros -> declarations
- From: Skef Wholey <Wholey@CMU-CS-C.ARPA>
- Date: Sat, 18 May 1985 18:56:00 -0000
- Cc: common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA, Fahlman@CMU-CS-C.ARPA, Moon@SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA
- In-reply-to: Msg of 18 May 1985 11:14-EDT from Kent M Pitman <KMP at SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA>
- Sender: WHOLEY@CMU-CS-C.ARPA
Date: Saturday, 18 May 1985 11:14-EDT
From: Kent M Pitman <KMP at SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 17 May 1985 23:50 EDT
From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@CMU-CS-C.ARPA>
As Moon points out, even with this change we would still need
PARSE-BODY for macro writers,
or my &BODY hack. No sense in not providing both, though.
I think that PARSE-BODY is needed even if the &BODY hack is used. People other
than DEFMACRO (the mythical code analysis tools, for example) should have some
convenient way to parse bodies. Also, providing such a hook and encouraging
everyone to use it could make users' lives easier when and if the language
changed in any radical way.
On the other hand, the fancy &BODY syntax is a great win, and should be in the
language as well.