[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
backquote
- To: KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM
- Subject: backquote
- From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 88 22:17:57 PST
- Cc: donc@vaxa.isi.edu, common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: Kent M Pitman's message of Thu, 10 Nov 88 17:55 EST <881110175533.0.KMP@BOBOLINK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
re: However, in implementations (such as the Symbolics implementation) which
support ",,@" as meaning "map , across the result of the first result, I
might sometimes write: [... a little test case ...]
Lucid Common Lisp supports ",,@" as meaning just exactly what CLtL pages
349-350 describe it to be. And indeed LCL comes up the same results for
your little test case.
Yes, I too have carped a bit about having yet another inscrutable meta-
language for describing backquote [I think that is the source of DonC's
complaint -- it's hard to understand CLtL pp349-50]. But Guy Steele has
always managed to convince me that, for any given example, the rules on
pp349-50 are consistent with the generally perceived notion of how
backquote should work. [By the bye, ask Quux about his favorite
little doubly-nested backquote example; as far as I know, it doesn't
even parse in the Genera reader.]
-- JonL --
- Follow-Ups:
- backquote
- From: Michael Greenwald <Greenwald@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- References:
- backquote
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>