[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
visible hash table nit
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: visible hash table nit
- From: David Vinayak Wallace <Gumby@MCC.COM>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 88 20:52 CDT
Could you use #T instead of #H?
Right now symbolics uses make-hash-table as an interface to a system
which uses an "appropriate" representation for the size of the table
(alist or hash-table only, I think.) One could imagine an
implementation which build a b-tree or whatever of its data (which would
still fit the GETHASH model, but wouldn't be a hash table in the strict
Touretzky, I don't know about your pedagogical needs (are you teaching
hashing functions too, or are they just a "black box" to your students?)
but in general it's better to hide the implementation from the user, and
a sort of a generic table representation seems "right."
Plus, I use #H for hosts.