extending DEFSTRUCT

[Rick.Busdiecker@H.GP.CS.CMU.EDU]

I also support the proposed extensions to structure handling.

    Date: Sat 24 Oct 87 15:16:08-EDT
    From: Dave.Touretzky@C.CS.CMU.EDU
    
    When *PRINT-STRUCTURE* in NIL:
      defstructs with their own print functions will use them
      defstructs without their own print function will print in the #<> notation

Is there really a standard for #<> notation?  If so, what is it and
where is it defined?  If not, perhaps we should define a default #<>
notation such as #<name-of-structure-type>.

			Rick