[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
EOF-VALUE
- To: barmar@think.com, MURRAY%cs.umass.edu@relay.cs.net
- Subject: EOF-VALUE
- From: Guy Steele <gls@Think.COM>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 87 15:26 EDT
- Cc: common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <870727112913.6.BARMAR@NIETZSCHE.THINK.COM>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 87 11:29 EDT
From: Barry Margolin <barmar@think.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 87 19:53 EDT
From: MURRAY%cs.umass.edu@relay.cs.net
...
...
However, I wouldn't object strongly to adding *eof-value*, as anyone who
types #.*eof-value* deserves what they get.
That's true even if we don't spec or implement it.
--Guy
- References:
- EOF-VALUE
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@think.com>