[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
type specifiers
- To: common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: type specifiers
- From: Timothy Daly <DALY@ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1987 15:24:00 -0000
CLtL states that
(SIMPLE-VECTOR *) is an abbreviation for (VECTOR T *)
except that the elements are of type simple vector (p47)
CLtL states that
If a type specifier is a list, the car of the list is a symbol
and the rest of the list is subsidiary type information. ... (p42)
CLtL state that
As a convenience, if a list has one or more unspecified items
at the end, such items may simply be dropped rather than writing
an explicit * for each one. (p43)
Is (SIMPLE-VECTOR T) valid? (semantics: (SIMPLE-VECTOR T *))
tim
DALY@IBM.COM