[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CLARIFICATION: [italics]package arguments.
- To: common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: Re: CLARIFICATION: [italics]package arguments.
- From: vrotney@vaxa.isi.edu
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 87 15:08:45 PDT
- In-reply-to: Your message of 17-Apr-87 10:18:00
In the spirit of making CLTL a slightly better specification, what
about the following extension?
On page 182, extend the statement
"Any argument described as a package name may be either
a string or a symbol."
to
"Any argument described in this section as a package name
or package may be either a string or a symbol."
Bill Vrotney USC/ISI
-------