[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

atom type question

To: common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
Subject: atom type question
From: Christopher Fry <cfry@OZ.AI.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 12 May 87 06:00 EDT

CLtL says, p. 73 "The predicate ATOM is true if its argument
is not a cons."

Is ATOM supposed to be true of non-COMMON data types as well?

Prev by Date: Smalltalk-80 Classes for Symbolics and/or CommonLisp
Next by Date: atom type question
Previous by thread: Smalltalk-80 Classes for Symbolics and/or CommonLisp
Next by thread: atom type question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread