[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
&REST
- To: berman@vaxa.isi.edu, common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: &REST
- From: Daniel L. Weinreb <DLW@ALDERAAN.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 87 18:10 EDT
- In-reply-to: <8705132124.AA02845@vaxa.isi.edu>
Date: 13 May 1987 1424-PDT (Wednesday)
From: berman@vaxa.isi.edu (Richard Berman)
My feelings are
that the above efficiency hack is a bug, even though it may be "supported by
hardware".
Can anyone show me a valid justification for the above behavior?
There isn't any justification. It's a bug. It's among the list of
documented non-conformances of the Symbolics implementation, most of
which are a whole lot less severe than this one. Unfortunately, it is
extremely difficult to fix without an unacceptable impairment of
performance in this implementation. "No excuse, sir."
- References:
- &REST
- From: berman@vaxa.isi.edu (Richard Berman)