[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inconsistencies in Sequence Function Arguments
- To: common-lisp@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU, sears%wrs.DEC@decwrl.DEC.COM
- Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in Sequence Function Arguments
- From: sears%wrs.DEC@decwrl.DEC.COM
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1987 13:48:00 -0000
I agree that REDUCE should take a :KEY keyword. There seems to be
little difficulty in implementing it, I have found it frequently
useful, and it provides consistency with the other sequence functions. The
change is upward compatible with the existing language.
/wrs