[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
*print-circle*
- To: common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- Subject: *print-circle*
- From: sandra%utah-orion@utah-cs.arpa (Sandra J Loosemore)
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 87 14:06:00 MST
Is there a compelling reason why *print-circle* is not required to identify
shared substructures, as well as circular structures? The "obvious" (to me)
implementation will detect both. Being able to write out a complex, linked
structure with the guarantee that its topology will be preserved when it
is read back in again seems like a very useful thing. I'd be glad to share
my code to do this if there is sufficient demand for it.
-Sandra
-------
- Follow-Ups:
- *print-circle*
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>