[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
another question about defmacro lambda lists
- To: Sandra J Loosemore <sandra%utah-orion@UTAH-CS.ARPA>
- Subject: another question about defmacro lambda lists
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 87 15:05 EST
- Cc: common-lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <8701231927.AA25049@utah-orion.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 87 12:27:25 MST
From: sandra%utah-orion@utah-cs.arpa (Sandra J Loosemore)
Does it make sense for nested lambda lists in a defmacro to contain things
like &environment? CLtL does not say whether the non-top-level lambda lists
should be ordinary function lambda lists or whether they can use the extended
syntax.
They certainly need to allow destructuring; it wouldn't make sense to have only
a single level of destructuring. I don't think &whole and &environment make
sense any place other than at the top level, though.