[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binding terminology
- To: Pavel.pa@Xerox.COM, Miller.PA@XEROX.COM
- Subject: Re: Binding terminology
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 87 22:12 EST
- Cc: Common-Lisp@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: <870204-175046-1399@Xerox>
- Line-fold: No
I hate to bother the whole mailing list with this, but it seems
necessary, since I've been mistaken as saying something biased
towards shallow binding.
I don't think you understood what I said. What I said has nothing to do
with implementation. Dynamic variables are changeable because when a
dynamic variable is referenced, that reference can refer at different
times to name/value associations created at different places in the
program. This is more changeable than lexical variables, where a given
reference always refers to a name/value association created at the same
place in the program.