[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Proposal #7A - Type-Specifier-P
- To: Common-Lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
- Subject: Proposal #7A - Type-Specifier-P
- From: James Rice <Rice@SUMEX-AIM.ARPA>
- Date: Mon 28 Jul 86 11:39:52-PDT
It seems to me that the proposed function Type-Specifier-P
is in fact Type-Name-P, since it cannot be called with an
arbitrary CL type specifier. Perhaps its name should be
changed accordingly.
Personally, I would prefer to have (Typep foo 'Type-Specifier) -
but then again I'd like all types to be represented by objects
of type Type too.
Rice
-------