[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
proposal #6 (&body parsing)
- To: SANDRA <LOOSEMORE@UTAH-20.ARPA>
- Subject: proposal #6 (&body parsing)
- From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1986 01:39:00 -0000
- Cc: common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
- In-reply-to: Msg of 28 Jul 1986 12:10-EDT from SANDRA <LOOSEMORE at UTAH-20.ARPA>
- Sender: FAHLMAN@C.CS.CMU.EDU
(1) If &rest and &body are not going to be the same anymore, will they
remain mutually exclusive? (I can imagine some situations where you might
want both a "parsed" and "unparsed" body -- although you could call
parse-body yourself instead to get this effect.)
I think they should remain mutually exclusive. As you say, the user can
always call parse-body directly, in the very rare case where both forms
are needed.
(2) Will we continue to allow both &body and &key together? This does
not make a great deal of sense to me, as a list of keyword/value pairs is
not what one typically thinks of as a "body".
One would probably never want to use &body and &key together, but I see
no reason to go out of our way to outlaw this.
-- Scott