[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal about lambda-list params
- To: NGALL@G.BBN.COM
- Subject: Re: Proposal about lambda-list params
- From: Guy Steele <gls@Think.COM>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 86 14:37 EDT
- Cc: common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA, gls@AQUINAS
- In-reply-to: <[G.BBN.COM]29-Jul-86 09:50:57.NGALL>
Date: 29 Jul 1986 09:50-EDT
From: NGALL@G.BBN.COM
...
But under some of the new declaration-semantics proposals, the ignore
decl. would apply to only one of the parameters, thus given
(lambda (x y x z x) (declare (ignore x))...)
a compiler should still warn (or signal an error) that two of the
parameters illegally share a name. ...
Maybe one should have to write
(lambda (x y x z x) (declare (ignore x) (ignore x) (ignore x))...)
to suppress all warnings.
--Quux :-)