[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Pavel.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Re: DESCRIBE-ARGUMENTS
- From: email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 86 10:20 EST
- Cc: oster%ucblapis@BERKELEY.EDU, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Reply-to: email@example.com
Date: 15 Jul 86 00:51 PDT
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 86 16:36:46 pdt
From: oster%ucblapis@BERKELEY.EDU (David Phillip Oster)
franz!fizzy!jkf in Mesg 14 suggests that DESCRIBE-ARGUMENTS return a
(a b c &optional d e &rest r &key x y &allow-other-keys)
Fahlman@c.cs.cmu.edu says that a list is hard to parse and a string
be returned instead. Is this a joke? Where are the ":-)"s?
The function exists in Interlisp and is very useful.
It is the case, however, that Xerox Common Lisp stores a list just
exactly like that in every compiled function...
Info is also lost if it is a string. Package qualifiers are needed to
tell which variables are being bound if any of the symbols in the arglist
Gold Hill Computers