[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "BACH::GREEK" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, common-lisp <common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA>
- Subject: Excuse me?
- From: David C. Plummer <DCP@SCRC-QUABBIN.ARPA>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 86 10:37 EST
- In-reply-to: The message of 3 Apr 86 15:08-EST from "BACH::GREEK" <email@example.com>
- Supersedes: <860404103736.2.DCP@FIREBIRD.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: 3 Apr 86 15:08:00 EST
From: "BACH::GREEK" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
You don't really mean that all of the lexical variables in a program
should be interned when the fastload file is loaded. Do you?
Excuse me, lexical variables aren't interned, print names are. Maybe
you are asking if there is any direct correlation between the lexical
variable and the symbol it was named in the program. No, there is no
direct correlation in the Symbolics implementation. There is an
indirect association for debugging purposes, but execution of compiled
code never looks there.