[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DEFUN inside LET
- To: Jonathan A Rees <JAR@MC.LCS.MIT.EDU>
- Subject: DEFUN inside LET
- From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1986 19:06:00 -0000
- Cc: common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
- In-reply-to: Msg of 29 Jan 1986 14:45-EST from Jonathan A Rees <JAR at MC.LCS.MIT.EDU>
- Sender: FAHLMAN@C.CS.CMU.EDU
Fine, I'm happy to agree that this passage is unequivocal. One might
have been confused by the mumbling about "top-level forms" that
surrounds this passage, but let's not be. Does anyone out there want to
argue that DEFUN inside of LET is not required to work?
-- Scott