[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SET vs. SETF
- To: David A. Moon <Moon at SCRC-TENEX at MIT-MC>
- Subject: SET vs. SETF
- From: FEINBERG at CMU-20C
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1982 20:10:00 -0000
- Cc: Common-Lisp at SU-AI, EAK at MIT-MC, Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
Howdy!
Sorry, I slipped. Anyway REMF, PUTF and GETF could be flushed
in favor of allowing lists to be passed to GETPR, PUTPR and REMPR. I
agree with EAK that we should call SETF SET.