[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Another inconsistency in CLtL
- To: SANDRA <LOOSEMORE@UTAH-20.ARPA>
- Subject: Another inconsistency in CLtL
- From: Rob MacLachlan <RAM@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 1986 15:54:00 -0000
- Cc: common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
- In-reply-to: Msg of 27 Dec 1985 13:53-EST from SANDRA <LOOSEMORE at UTAH-20.ARPA>
I brought this up a couple months back, and I believe the
consensus was that all the functions that take package arguments will
accept a string or symbol as well, excepting the PACKAGE-xxx functions
which will only accept a package object. I doesn't say this anywhere
in the manual; this is a "clarification."
Rob