[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
- Subject: Spelling correction
- From: Rene Bach <BACH@SU-SCORE.ARPA>
- Date: Mon 20 Jan 86 09:48:22-PST
I am new on this list (please forgive me if this topic has been discussed
It has been our experience that using the spelling correction facilities
provided by Interlisp are very useful to provide nice user interfaces.
It is also my belief that to do flexible symbol matching requires
My question is: why doesn't CL include a specification for a spelling
correction function. The description of the Interlisp functions could be
used as specification for the I/O. The choice of the algorithm could
be left open.