[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Things to do
- To: HIC%SCRC-TENEX@MIT-MC.ARPA
- Subject: Re: Things to do
- From: Charles Hedrick <HEDRICK@RUTGERS.ARPA>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 1983 04:43:00 -0000
- Cc: Fahlman@CMU-CS-C.ARPA, common-lisp@SU-AI.ARPA
- In-reply-to: Message from "Howard I. Cannon <HIC at SCRC-TENEX>" of 17 Aug 83 00:36:25 EDT
An alternative might be
movei n,2
pushj p,@[fadr block]
where the address in the fadr block was indexed by N. That would still
save testing and dispatching within the function itself, but would
avoid adding 4 words to the FADR block. What do you think?
-------